I have been working for the company as a Second Officer for two contracts. Overall, it maintains high standards, has good vessels and provides the necessary supplies. Inspections are taken very seriously, with extensive checklist preparation and regular testing. The food depends on the cook and the vessel's trading area, but the company does not appear to economize on it. There is a lot of paperwork and a very large SMS, and some difficult captains remain in the fleet.
I had two interviews with the company, one last year and one this year. I failed the first time but passed the second time, although I ultimately chose another company. The interview was difficult and required precise answers to questions based both on professional experience and the company's SMS; each interview lasted about one to one and a half hours.
I worked for the company for three contracts in different positions, in 2000, 2010 and 2014. The salaries were good, but the superintendents treated people harshly, including shouting, humiliating crew members and being rude. There was also a culture of reporting on colleagues and trying to undermine them. I would not return to this company.
I worked on Suezmax and VLCC tankers for three contracts. I completed two six-month contracts as an ordinary seaman and received three promotions to Third Officer. I later went through the company's interview process, and the interviews lasted about one and a half hours each and focused on SMS, SOLAS and other technical requirements. I was offered a contract as a Third Officer at a lower salary than agreed, and on board I encountered an extremely difficult captain and extensive CCTV monitoring of the crew.
I completed two contracts with cameras installed in the engine control room. The constant monitoring was a significant inconvenience during my work on board.
I worked for the company on gas carriers. There were frequent problems with crew changes, affecting both engineers and deck officers. Spare parts and supplies were generally provided without problems, and the company increased pay by $100–300 after each contract.
I was already on board for one month after joining the company from a Greek employer, and I had no regrets about the move. The living and working conditions were quite good, as were the salaries. I would recommend the company.
I have been working for the company as a Third Officer. The interview consisted of two sessions of about one and a half hours each. The company places a strong emphasis on pre-joining training, has a very large and frequently updated SMS, and requires a great deal of paperwork. Working hours can be demanding, including four-hour watches during the working day and in port. On arrival, I also found that the work clothes I had requested before the voyage were not available.
I went through the interview process for a Third Engineer position and did not pass. The inspector required detailed answers to all questions in English, and the interview lasted about an hour and a half; candidates who pass are then referred to a technical superintendent.